Skip navigation

Here’s a rough draft of the Memorandum of Argument I’m looking to file with the Courts in reference to my Charter Challenge. Anyone interested in making comments, or suggestions can email me at abyss@paradigmslip.ca.

MEMORANDUM OF ARGUMENT

PART I.                  STATEMENT OF FACTS

OVERVIEW

  1. The Applicant, ANDREW ABBASS (“Mr. Abbass”) submits that the judicial process invoked by Subsections 318(3), 319(6) and 320(7) (the “Subsections”) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”) are not compliant with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”) and subject to just remedy under Section 24 (1) of the Charter or found to have no force or effect under Section 52 (1) of the Constitution Act of 1982.
  2. Whereas the Applicant believes his right to equality before, under and in the benefit of and protection of the law, guaranteed by Section 15(1) of the Charter have been violated by the judicial proceedings initiated through his exercising of his responsibility as a citizen of Canada to uphold Canada’s laws, subject to just remedy under Section 24(1) of the Charter.
  3. Whereas Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act of 1982 requires the Charter to be upheld as the Supreme Law of Canada, in that the preamble of the Charter recognizes the rule of law as a founding principle, the Subsections represent a direction violation of the rule of law capable of impeding fundamental justice.
  4. The Applicant will argue that these Subsections should be recognized by this Court as special privileges afforded to the Attorney General for interpreting the language and context of the laws in good faith, not an inalienable interpretive language right protected by the Charter or any Act.
  5. The Applicant therefore seeks an order rescinding, repealing or revoking Subsections 318(3), 319(6) and 320(7) of the Criminal Code of Canada under Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act of 1982, or amending them by adding “unless interested” at the end of each subsection, or any just remedy the Court considers appropriate under Section 24(1) of the Charter.


BACKGROUND FACTS TO THIS CASE

Mr. Abbass’ filing of the Charge of Incitement towards Genocide

  1. On July 16th, 2014 the Applicant, Andrew Abbass, learned of the deaths of 4 children on a beach in Gaza. Video coverage and pictures of the aftermath of the event were widely available on social media outlets.
  2. The following day, July 17th, 2014, while looking for a Canadian response on CBC’s website pertaining to the funeral of the 4 children killed the previous day, the Applicant found minimal coverage of the event.
  3. During his search, the Applicant discovered a Huffington Post article about a YouTube video the Conservative Party of Canada had quietly released to its Israeli supporters on July 16th, 2014. (Through Fire and Water)
  4. In viewing the video, the Applicant and was disturbed by the splicing together of military and political footage with aggressive music and quotes from Prime Minister Stephen Harper and then Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird.
  5. The Applicant showed the video directly to several associates who were also offended by the juxtaposition of aggressive imagery, quotes and music.
  6. To better understand the nature of what the Applicant felt was offensive, he compiled a transcript of the video to analyze the selected quotes and imagery.
  7. In compiling this transcript, the Applicant found what he believed to be a sophisticated language of hatred and incitement towards genocide.
  8. The purpose of this use of this language, in the opinion of the Applicant, was to incite the Israeli people towards attacking the people of Gaza, implying that their actions were justified and morally correct in the eyes of Canada.
  9. The Applicant initially telephoned the RCMP in Ottawa on the 20th of July to report the crime, but was informed he would have to file the charges through his local jurisdiction.
  10. On the morning of July 21st, the Applicant filed charges with the RNC in Corner Brook, Newfoundland. As the crime occurred outside their jurisdiction, an RNC liaison officer was assigned and the charges were forwarded to the RCMP in St. John’s.
  11. The Applicant received a phone call from RCMP officer JOHN DOE on July 30th, requesting a meeting for August 1st.
  12. The Applicant met with the plain clothed RCMP officer on August 1st, who informed the Applicant that no charges were being pressed.
  13. The officer informed the Applicant that the video and statement by the Prime Minister were being considered a governing policy, not criminal and that his only option was to vote in the next election.
  14. The following Tuesday, August 5th, the Applicant filed a complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP.
  15. The report compiled by the Officer undertaking the investigation of the complaint has been completed and a letter of Disposition is to be made available in the coming months. (Document)


PART II.                                STATEMENT OF QUESTIONS IN ISSUE

  1. The Applicant submits that the process he has undertaken as part of his responsibilities as a Canadian citizen raise the following important issues of law that are of national and public importance:

Issue 1:   Do the Subsections violate the rule of law by placing the Attorney General’s interpretation of what constitutes incitement towards genocide and the creation and dissemination of hate propaganda above the law?

Issue 2:    Do the current form of these Subsections allow a conflict whereby the consent privileges given to the Attorney General by the Code can impede the course of fundamental justice in crimes where he is personally interested?

  1. These issues warrant consideration by this Honourable Court on the basis that:
    • These are both novel and important questions of law.
    • The Subsections have never been tested for Charter compliance in this manner.
    • Variations of the Subsections are also present in other sections of the Code, as well as pending Bill C-51.
    • The need to have these issues addressed is pressing and the objective is both proportional and justifiable to maintain a free and democratic society.
    • The means are rationally connected to the objective and result in the minimal impairment of rights of all Canadians.


PART III                               STATEMENT OF ARGUMENT

This Is A Case That Raises Issues of National and Public Importance

  1. Incitement towards genocide and the creation and dissemination of hate propaganda are crimes made infamous by the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany. Section 318, 319, and 320 of the Criminal Code of Canada were drafted with the legislative intent of criminalizing these types of behaviors before they can do substantial damage to the public good.
  2. The potential for the impairment of justice on these matters through conflicting interpretations of the Criminal Code of Canada has a significant impact on Canadians. Laws expected to provide protection to citizens from the abuses of power that allowed Nationalist Socialist Germany to undertake the Holocaust should not allow for interpretations capable of impeding fundamental justice.
  3. To that end, the Criminal Code of Canada together with the Charter have the expectation of being designed to protect the rights and freedoms of law abiding citizens by ensuring that a proper legal framework exists to have such matters addressed by the judicial system in a timely and just manner.
  4. Delaying justice on a matter involving the incitement towards hatred and the dissemination of hate propaganda has the effect of increasing the damage to society and the public good on a national and global scale. In the opinion of the Applicant, The RCMP and Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP do not have the legal authority to engage in a proper and timely balancing of the importance of the rights at stake in this matter.
  5. Section 15(1) of the Charter states that every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit without discrimination. In dismissing the charges with no legal justification offered or route for appeal, the Applicant feels his rights to engage the legal process in a matter of grave importance have been violated, therefore allowing the Court to proscribe just remedy under Section 24(1) of the Charter in consideration of the circumstances of the violation.
  6. In filing an Originating Application (“Contract”) with the Supreme Court of Newfoundland as a self-representing citizen, the Applicant brings this matter before this Honourable Court to advance the pursuit of fundamental justice in the spirit of good faith and the public interest.
  7. The Supreme Court of Canada acknowledges that good faith as it applies to the matter of contractual obligation should be a founding principle from which the Court manifests its interpretation of the Common Law of Contracts:

There is an organizing principle of good faith that parties generally must perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously or arbitrarily.  An organizing principle states in general terms a requirement of justice from which more specific legal doctrines may be derived. An organizing principle therefore is not a free‑standing rule, but rather a standard that underpins and is manifested in more specific legal doctrines and may be given different weight in different situations.  It is a standard that helps to understand and develop the law in a coherent and principled way.(2014 SCC 71 – J Cromwell)

  1. While the opinion of individual citizens on legal matters carries little weight in determining the proper course of the law, the ruling of this Honourable Court can provide guidance and direction to the Applicant and other citizens in determining if the issues presented require an expeditious, lawful and just remedy to maintain a free and democratic society.


Issue 1:
   Charter Compliance of Code Sections 318-3, 319-6 and 320-7

  1. The existing language used in Subsection 318(3), 319(6) and 320(7) of the Code are a direct violation of the rule of law. They allowing the consent (“arbitrary decision”) of the Attorney General (“appointed official”) to govern the prosecution of criminal justice in these crimes.
  2. The original legislative intent of inserting the Subsections may have been to prevent charges from being filed for spurious reasons, but they also created the potential for limiting a citizen’s lawful ability to seek justice for any crimes committed by the Federal government under this Section of the Code.
  3. By placing the Attorney General interpretative privileges above the law in question, the Subsections violate the founding precepts of the Charter which recognize the Supremacy of God and the rule of Law. In accordance with Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act of 1982, the Subsections as they currently exist should be found to have no force or effect.
  4. The equality rights provided by Section 15(1) of the Charter have been interpreted by the Court to be aimed at preventing :

“violation of essential human dignity and freedom through the imposition of disadvantage, stereotyping, or political and social prejudices, and to promote a society in which all persons enjoy equal recognition at law as human beings or as members of Canadian society, equally capable and equally deserving of concern, respect and consideration.” (Iacobucci J. in Law v. Canada, [1999])

  1. To prevent further violation of essential human dignity through possible crimes against humanity, the Applicant taken a purposive approach to contextualize the dire need to address these Subsections within the broader scope of the law and requirement of maintaining a free and democratic society.
  2. The Applicant respectfully submits that grounds exist to challenge the Charter-compliance of the Subsections through either Section 24(1) of the Charter or Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act of 1982.


Issue 2:
Potential Consent-based Conflicts Of Interest in Criminal Code of Canada

  1. By denying the ability of the judicial branch to prosecute crimes of this nature without the consent of the Attorney General, the potential for a conflict of interest is created. It is difficult to envision a situation where the Attorney General would consent to the prosecution of a crime he himself may be found complicit in.
  2. To that end, several other instances of this particular formulation of the consent clause are found through-out the Code that can deny the prosecution of justice. Taken in this manner, they grant the Attorney General the ability to consent to the criminal act instead of prosecuting it.
  3. These consent clauses are found in wide range of laws, some of which are quite concerning when examined for their potential for abuse. The following list illustrates the possibility of crimes from the Code that can be committed with this embedded privilege providing immunity to prosecution:
  • 7(2.33) – offenses occurring in space
  • 7(4.3) – sexual offenses against children
  • 7(7) – denying prosecution of criminal foreign nationals
  • 54 – assisting a deserter
  • 24 – terrorism, hiding terrorist property, banking with terrorists
  • 136(3) – providing false evidence
  • 141 (2) – bribery
  • 164(7) – voyeurism, corruption of morals, child pornography, advertising sexual services
  • 283(2) – kidnapping
  • 318(3) – advocating genocide
  • 319(6) – public incitement of hatred
  • 320(7) – denying seizure of hate propaganda
  • 347(7) – allowing criminal interest rates
  • 385(2) – concealing title documents
  • 422(3) – breach of contract, intimidation and discrimination against trade unionists
  • 477.2 (1) – offenses committed by a non-citizen on a foreign ship in Canadian waters
  • 477.2 (2) – offenses committed in the economic zone of Canada by citizens or in relation to citizens
  • 477.2 (3) – offenses committed in non-recognized states (ie: Palestine)
  • 477.3 (3) – piracy
  • 810.01 (1) – intimidation of the criminal justice system or a journalist
  • 810.2 (1) – threatening violence, endanger safety, inflicting psychological damage and various forms of sexual assault
  1. While the list of Attorney General Consent clauses presented is not exhaustive, there is a pattern in that the majority of the offenses have the potential to be exceptionally socially damaging crimes and few reasons exist to allow such a clause to prevent justice.
  2. In addition, Bill C-51 introduces new consent clauses that can further impede the judicial process without due oversight.
  3. Through examining the legislative intent of the drafting of Bill C-51 in light of the comparable consent clauses already shown to have potential for abuse, the Supreme Court has the opportunity to provide guidance in ensuring that the principle of good faith is applied not only to common law contracts, but the social contract that provides for a good faith between Canadian citizens and the Government of Canada.


Summary And Conclusion

  1. pending


PART IV.               COST SUBMISSIONS

  1. This Applicant seeks for leave to raise issues of national and public importance before the court to seek a just and appropriate remedy. No costs are requested.


PART V.                NATURE OF ORDER SOUGHT

  1. The Applicant therefore seeks an order rescinding, repealing or revoking Subsections 318(3), 319(6) and 320(7) of the Criminal Code of Canada under Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act of 1982, or amending them by adding “unless interested” at the end of each subsection, or any just remedy the Court considers appropriate under Section 24(1) of the Charter.

ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

Dated at the City of Corner Brook in the Province of Newfoundland this *** day of February, 2015.

_______________
Andrew Abbass
Applicant

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

A research associate of mine sent me this a while back.

Thought it might be of interest to anyone who’s been following the seaweed portion of the blog, I can’t remember mentioning it directly.

Hypoxia-mediated downregulation of miRNA biogenesis promotes tumour progression

Here we report a previously unrecognized effect of hypoxia in the downregulation of ​Drosha and ​Dicer in cancer cells that leads to dysregulation of miRNA biogenesis and increased tumour progression. (Published 

You might notice that the recognition of this effect existing through the study of whale diving patterns was first published back on May 12th, 2012.

-Andrew

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

Canada,

I filed a Charter Challenge against clauses in the Criminal Code that violate the Charter and allow the Federal Government to use incitement towards genocide and institutionalized racism as a political tool.

Charter Challenge

I’m hoping to unite people behind the idea that we can fix the law to better follow the Charter, removing this additional right for the Attorney General and the PMO that’s been entrenched in the Criminal Code for decades.

I’ve got a Thunderclap setup to try to raise awareness: #Justice is in Your Hands

And a petition that’s been up since July: Arrest Harper for Inciting Genocide Against Muslims

And the original charges which were dismissed because of the clauses being challenged: Charges filed July 21, 2014

I’ve been trying to get all this done by myself, but things would happen much faster if there was more grassroots support.

The Thunderclap launches on the 25th at 6:00PM Newfoundland time.

Parliament re-opens on the 26th.

Del Mastro gets sentenced on the 27th.

The first court hearing for the Charter Challenge is set for January 28th at 9:15AM in Corner Brook.

I hope to have your support on this matter.

-Andrew

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

Received an update letter from the RCMP yesterday in regards to the on-going complaint investigation.

RCMP_Letter_Dec15-2014.pdf

They expect to have the investigation clued up in the next month(s?), where they will be able to provide me with a Letter of Disposition.

At that point, the complaint can undergo a further appeal and even a public hearing of all the facts in the matter.

I’m wonder which will be completed first, the Charter Challenge or the Investigation?

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

Help raise awareness of how these flawed laws are being exploited to allow the governments of Israel and Canada to commit genocide (latin: tribe killing).

Join the campaign, spread the word, demand the rule of law be upheld.

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

I filed an originating application here in Corner Brook on the 19th to bring a conflict between the Canadian Criminal Code and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms before the Supreme Court of Newfoundland.

Respondents include the Attorney General of both Canada and Newfoundland.

The Charter Challenge is in regards to what I’m going the call the #SatanicClauses of Canada’s genocide laws. I believe these clauses, 318-3, 319-6 and 320-7, violate the rule of law by literally placing the interpretations of the Attorney General above the law in question. This creates a potential conflict of interest should the Attorney General be charged under these laws. They allow the Attorney General to play the Devil’s Advocate in regards to the interpretation and application, hence the appellation #SatanicClauses.

As the Charter is founded on the supremacy of the rule of law, that law should govern a nation, as opposed to arbitrary decisions by individual government officials, these clauses exist in direct conflict with our constituting documents.

As Section 52.1 of the Charter states that the Charter is the supreme law of Canada, any law that is inconsistent with it’s provisions, in this case the rule of law, is found to have no force or effect to the extent of the inconsistency.

To that end, striking these clauses from the Canadian Criminal Code should place the power to determine whether to prosecute the crime of genocide with the courts, restoring the rule of law in Canada.

Israel has the same sort of clause in their genocide law: http://preventgenocide.org/il/law1950.htm

The court date is January 28th, 2015 at 9:15AM the filed (but redacted) documents are available below.

http://paradigmslip.ca/Charter_Challenge_318-3_319-6_320-7.pdf

These charges cost me $86.36 to file with the court and mail out. Pretty cheap for a civil revolution.

Please feel free to plagiarize my work.

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

Have to segue just to post some update information for those following the political aspect of this blog.

Here’s an letter I received from the RCMP last week advising me of the status of their investigation. I’ve redacted the names of the officers involved to protect their identities.

RCMP_Letter_November 6-2014

You can, however, feel free to call in an request updates yourself if you’d like. The file number is 2014-1030376.

RCMP Headquarters – 613-993-7267 

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

Been a over a week since I posted that last update, so I felt obliged to follow up on it.

Let me fill in a little background information on other things I work on for those who haven’t read down past the post regarding Canadian politics.

There’s a compound currently in use across the world called DCA. Dichloroacetate, usually as a sodium or potassium salt. It’s classified as completely synthetic, but it’s been shown for decades to have an effect on people and animals with mitochondrial disorders.

In 2007, researchers at the University of Alberta published research that showed it was shrinking tumors in lab animals. After researching the effect in vitro and in vivo, they theorized that the method of action was a catalytic effect on the mitochondria of each cell which was restoring basic functionality that is known to be lacking in all cancerous cells. Restoring this functionality allows pre-cancerous cells to return to normal and triggers apoptosis (natural cell death) in cancerous cells, shrinking tumors.

If it helps, you can think of the cell as a mini-computer in your body’s Internet. DNA is your cell’s hard drive where it stores all the information about how to build each of your cells and interact with neighboring cells. All the processing of this information goes on within the various organelles of the cell. This cellular fluid is the data bus that allows information to transit between these various sites and the cell wall is where it communicates with the cellular Internet. One of the most important organelles, the mitochondria, performs key processes that are essential to multicellular life. It controls efficient energy production through oxidative phosphorylation, as well as triggering important cellular processes like apoptosis. Think of this as sort of an Inner Engine that acts as malware protection for your cellular computer. It protects not only the cell, but the neighboring network of cells. When it malfunctions, the cell begins to lose its multicellular character, instead acting like the single celled or colony organisms that multicellular life evolved from. We call this malfunctioning state cancer.

The University of Alberta’s research was initially seen favorably as providing a foundation for a new non-toxic and non-invasive treatment for cancers that seemed to be broad spectrum. All cancerous cells steal their energy requirements from neighboring non-cancerous cells, producing their own energy through glycolysis, an energy production regime that produces energy through the fermentation of sugars. This energy production process takes place in the cellular fluid and is, evolutionarily speaking, one of the most ancient metabolic pathways. It’s common in single-celled organisms as it allows them to produce energy in the absence of oxygen. Multicellular life requires active mitochondria capable of using oxygen to produce energy more efficiently. When these newer metabolic pathways break down, we end up with cancer or other conditions as our cells strive for individual instead of multicellular survival.

What makes the mitochondria of a cell malfunction?

It can be any number of factors. Toxins, mutation due to radiation, genetic factors, or just general oxidative stress from diet and lifestyle. A single malfunctioning mitochondria doesn’t mean you’ll end up with cancer. Some cells, like those in your liver, have thousands of these organelles. Since the liver is responsible for dealing with toxins, the high number of mitochondria per cell make sense. It maximizes the cellular processing power available for removing toxins from the body. But if you pour enough toxins and stress into your body for long enough, even the thousands of mitochondria in your liver cells can go on strike.

This compound, DCA, seemed to have the potential to reactivate these important cellular functions. It alleviates oxidative stress by restoring mitochondrial function. This much had already been known for years, as that was its original use in both humans and animals prior to the cancer discovery in 2007. Several studies were funded by Health Canada and contributions from individuals, but no interest was ever found from the pharmaceutical industry. DCA is an off-patent compound. It was first synthesized and patented decades ago and that patent has long since expired. Because the compound is so simple, it’s difficult to make a signature version of the compound to produce a similar effect. Therefore, there’s been no commercial interest in funding research.

Since the initial publishing, new research has come to light that shed doubt on DCA’s ability to deal with broad spectrum cancers. The University of Guelph in Ontario released their findings in 2010 that DCA was ineffective against hypoxic tumors. When considering that the mitochondria requires the presence of oxygen to perform its energy generation, this makes sense according to the theory put forth by Alberta regarding DCA’s function. What Guelph found was that DCA was actually strengthen these hypoxic cells, making them more resistance to traditional forms of chemotherapy.

What doesn’t make sense is what followed. Instead of concluding that they should treat the hypoxia as a symptom that can be relieved, the conclusions out of Guelph were that DCA was simply unsuitable for use as a broad spectrum treatment.

Why?

This is where my thoughts entered the picture and my thinking went in a different direction.

In 2007, while the father of one of my friends was dying with cancer, I first learned of the DCA results published in Alberta. At the time, the research seemed exciting and innovative and really caught my interest. I knew the results were only preliminary, but the seemed to advance the knowledge of cancer in a bold new direction that looked to provide real answers. It gave me hope that the cure had been found.

One of the my first thoughts regarding this compound as I learned more was that it was incredibly simple. Structurally, it’s identical to the acetate ion (vinegar), but with two of the hydrogen atoms on the methyl-group replaced by chlorine. Why would a compound as simple as vinegar that has such a beneficial impact on cellular machinery not exist in nature?

Since the presence of heavier halogens like chlorine is foreign to fresh water lakes and streams, I wondered if it didn’t occur naturally in a marine environment instead. Sea water is full of heavy halogens and plants like seaweed concentrate it out of the sea water for their own uses. This is why seaweed is use as a source of iodine. In realizing that, I came to the conclusion early on that seaweeds might be an overlooked source of compounds like DCA, theorizing that iodine might replace the chlorine in the compound to produce a stronger analogue.

I wrote letters to researchers, posted in science-based forums, and emailed email listservs to try to find new information. The closest I found to the Iodine-based version of the compound was a bit of scientific research on tomato wound healing where they used sodium diiodoacetate to perform the electrophoretic seperation of RNA. The research paper mentioned a book from the 80s that described the method used, but that had been removed from subsequent editions of the book and I couldn’t find the original to learn more.

In 2011, after years of hobby research, I was directed to a chemical research site by a colleague. Through that site I found a link to research conducted by a researcher from New Zealand who’d been studying a popular edible Hawaiian red seaweed. The research had been published in the late 70s. The intent had been to determine what kinds of organic acids exist in the edible species. Sure enough, right there in the middle of the document was not only the chlorinated version, DCA, but the Iodine-based version I’d been looking for, and other compounds based on Bromine and a mix between Iodine, Bromine and Chlorine.

Just so we’re clear here, this research paper from the 70s proves that DCA is not a new synthetic compound as is currently put forth by the modern medical establishment. Evolutionarily speaking, red seaweeds are exceptionally old. They are among the first multicellular life to evolve on this planet.

Excited by this new finding, I fired up my email and forums and began trying to talk to people about the idea again. I was met with doubt and disbelief and one person who sent me the link to the Guelph hypoxia studies, which he believed proved that DCA was unsuitable for use. Because I’d been considering the source as occurring naturally in marine environments, I had a different perspective on the issue of hypoxia. Marine animals don’t have to worry about hypoxic tissue the same way us land animals do. They can live at depths in the ocean where the atmospheric pressure is so high that oxygen dissolves directly into fluids as opposed to being carried by the blood. This combination creates a niche where animals who consume large quantities of phytoplankton and krill, and also spend their days diving deep, would be receiving these potent anti-cancer benefits naturally. This would allow them to grow to a prodigious size and be able to fend off cancers with ease, relative to us poor land animals limited to a very narrow window of atmospheric pressure in our daily lives.

Hence blue whales.

To clarify everything so far, let me restate it:

  • Synthetic compound (DCA) turns out to have anti-cancer properties – 2007
  • My original hypothesis that DCA may occur naturally – 2007
  • Synthetic compound (DCA) is shown not to work on hypoxic tumors – 2010
  • Rediscovery that DCA is not synthetic but occurs naturally in Asparagopsis Taxiformis – 2011
  • Hypothesis that hyperbaric therapy eliminates the hypoxic symptoms  – 2012

Trying to put all this together, I made a video that tries to explain it as best I can in plainer language for a general audience. It received very little attention. There are a million people out there who claim to have found a treatment for cancer, I’d just become another crank with a theory in a very large pond.

Fast Forward to 2014

After publishing the information online in 2012 and sending it out to various research groups who promptly ignored it, I became a little discouraged about the whole problem. I’m not wealthy in the material sense, so I have no way of bringing these concepts forward myself. I’m currently trying to build another business to help finance my other research, but I’m having plenty of difficulty there, even though I’m working with a simpler concept that is easier to prove.

I did start eating seaweed on a regular basis after obtaining a regular supply of dulse from Real Raw Food in Vancouver so the idea was never far from my mind. I didn’t have access to a hyperbaric chamber or the money to go scuba diving on a regular basis though, so I was still searching for a way to obtain the full benefits. I hoped that more research would be completed that would verify my thoughts or that someone would stumble across mine and might trigger some inspiration that would lead them to the answers.

I built this blog, ParadigmSlip, as a means for cataloging some of the various research I’ve completed and for ease of sharing. I’d found it difficult to talk directly about these ideas because they’re so esoteric, so a blog seemed like the best way to keep my thoughts organized. I hadn’t done much work on the seaweed/hyperbaric cancer theory as I waited for more results of existing DCA therapy to be published.

During Spring of 2014, I was home watching the movie “The Fountain”, when I had an epiphany. The Fountain starts with a quote from the Bible:

Genesis 3:24 – So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way of the tree of life.

During one of the first scenes, the main character is accosted by someone with a literal flaming sword. The juxtaposition of the image of a flaming sword and that particular Biblical quote brought up an image in my mind from my research. Asparagopsis taxiformis, the same seaweed that I’d been researching for its health benefits, looks like a flaming sword that turns back and forth under water. The flaming sword wasn’t meant to be thought of as guarding the Tree of Life, but showing the way to the Tree of Life.

Red Seaweed even shows up at the base of the Tree of Life of modern evolutionary theory. It’s one of the first multicellular lifeforms to appear on the planet. It contains potent compounds shown to promote mitochondrial functioning that can’t form in fresh water sources naturally.

The idea that the mythological Tree of Life that appears in a variety of ancient cultures might have a common origin in red seaweeds instead of terrestrial plants set my mind on fire. I started digging through the mythologies of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Maya, and hordes of others looking for common links and finding many.

Another commonality that blew my mind was that all these ancient cultures who’d incorporated this red seaweed into their lifestyle to the point of venerating it were also monument building hydraulic cultures. Not only that, but with my understanding of the need for eliminating hypoxia, their monuments seemed to serve a purpose beyond being simple temples for religious worship or burial mounds.

They were hyperbaric chambers, powered by water.

There’s a lot more that I have to write on this subject, but I wanted to publish this much for today. Most of the next post will be in regards to the mythological and Biblical links.

—————————————-

Revelations 22: 1-3

Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations3

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

What you’re about to read you may find shocking or just ridiculous. While I usually don’t follow Canadian global politics, this Spring I became interested following the Maidan riots in Ukraine. A Russian-Ukrainian-Jewish friend gave me a much different perspective than the Canadian or American media was presenting, and as the situation evolved there I set out to educate myself more on Canada’s involvement.

While the media portrayed the Maidan riots as a Ukrainian Spring against a Russian-led government, the truth of the situation is much more complicated. In the more industrialized Western Ukraine, the locals support closer ties with the EU. In the East, which is a more agricultural population, the locals are worried about the new agricultural regulations that will become part of their centralized economy should Ukraine join the EU. The imposition of strict regulations that will determine which crops and livestock they can grow and sell not just to other nations but within their own communities has created a fear that they’re witnessing a repeat of the Holomodor, a recognized Ukrainian genocide brought about by poor agricultural policy directives of the USSR. The Eastern Ukrainians see the EU encroachment as a opening the door to a new Holomodor, where Western Ukraine reaps the benefits of being the industrialized portion of the country. Meanwhile the Eastern Ukrainians are left to deal with the encroachment of corporate agriculture that will strip away land titles and eliminate their way of life. This has lead to them seeking support from Russia, who has traditionally been a large purchaser of Ukrainian agriculture.

Following the Maidan riots and the ousting of President Yanukovych on Feb 21st, 2014, the new government was propped up by the radical groups responsible for his removal. Some of these groups adhere to strict National Socialist ideologies. Large portions of the current government of Ukraine are the ideological descendants of the same Ukrainian National Socialists that were quick to side with Nazi Germany during the Second World War. Western Ukraine quickly built concentration camps following their absorption into Greater Germany. Eastern Ukraine, being the road through which Germany invaded Russia, saw more recruitment into the Red Army during the initial invasion and subsequent Russian counter-invasion. However, even up until the end of the war in 1945 there were still atrocities being committed against the Jewish population in the portions of Ukraine controlled by Nazi-Germany. Following the end of the war and the absorption of Ukraine into the USSR, the ultra-nationalist ideologies of National Socialism (Or Social Nationalism as they’ve re-coined it) continued to flourish in Ukraine during the Cold War. Despite Nazism being stamped out of Germany, it had already sown the seeds of its rebirth in Ukraine and we’re seeing that played out today on the global stage.

In the aftermath of the Maidan coup that removed President Yanukovych from power, the Far Right ultra-nationalist groups established a puppet government that was immediately recognized by Western countries who began funnelling funds to the new government. This government immediately adopted an anti-Russian posture, going so far as to outlaw the speaking of Russian in public spaces and government offices. This marginalized a large portion of the Eastern Ukrainian population, especially those in Crimea.

The second consequence of the Maidan coup was the Russian annexation of Crimea. This was largely derided by the West as an aggressive expansionist move. However, this situation requires an understanding of the context how unstable the situation had become. Crimea is home to Russia’s largest Naval base, with over 10,000 citizens stationed there prior to the overthrow of Yanukovych. Although Ukraine itself gave up its nuclear arsenal (3rd largest in the world at the time) when they gained their autonomy in the 90s, Russia would have still kept a nuclear arsenal for the Black Sea Fleet at various military bases on the Crimean peninsula such as Sevastopol. With the fall of Yanukovych and the rise of a new anti-Russian ultra-nationalist government, Russia did the only sane thing possible. They moved to protect their nuclear arsenal by annexing Crimea and expelling the Ukrainian military units under a new leadership that posed a threat to global nuclear security.

The response from the new Ukrainian government to this annexation was to declare Russia an aggressor and demand nuclear weapons from their new allies in the West. This story blew up in Western media very quickly and culminated when Russia took control of Sevastopol and expelled Ukrainian military on March 7th. This loss was met with the loudest call for Ukraine to re-arm itself with nuclear weapons, triggering talk of nuclear war in the media. This media event was then eclipsed the following day, March 8th, by the disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370. The media would spend every day covering the disappearance for the next month and talk of nuclear war and the Crimea situation disappeared from the media.

As Russia solidified its hold on Crimea, the new pro-Western ultra-nationalist government would begin it’s civil war against the Eastern regions of Ukraine that were considering ceding from Ukraine to maintain closer ties with Russia.

During the next few months, Ukraine would elect their a new President to replace Yanukovych, with elections overseen by the Harper government. The end result was a victory for the pro-West, pro-EU billionaire Petro Poroshenko. Assuming office on June 7th, he initially promoted a peaceful solution to the rebellion in the Eastern regions, but his rhetoric eventually turned. He labelled the separatists terrorists and officially resumed hostilities on Canada Day, July 1st.

Concurrent to the situation in Ukraine, another problem was emerging in the Middle East:

In January of this year, Prime Minister Stephen Harper visited Israel and spoke to the Israeli Knesset. While much of his speech was bland and political, portions of it were specifically tailored to produce a negative emotional response in those listening. He used a very sophisticate language of hate, honed through years of Canadian politics, to incite anger between the Jewish and non-Jewish citizens of Israel and Palestine. He proclaimed that Israel was a Jewish state, marginalizing the Muslim and Christian population. He also advised abandoning the peace process in favor of military force to settle differences that have been brewing for decades.

The breakdown in the peace process initiated by Harper lead to increased hostilities between Israel and Palestine. This came to a head when 3 Israeli teens were kidnapped and executed by an unknown group. Hamas initially applauded the kidnapping, but came out against the murders, although Israel would use the media to accuse them of planning the entire kidnapping. In response to the murder of the 3 teens, a Palestinian youth was kidnapped, beaten, had gas forced down his throat and was then set on fire. The brutality of this Israeli response triggered an increase in hostilities that resulted in rocket attacks from Gaza. During these attacks, Canadian MPs visiting Israel were forced to take cover. Western media used the attacks to create the perception that Gazans were terrorists attacking Canadians instead of a response to increased hostilities and the violent revenge execution of a Palestinian youth.

Unlike previous years, where an exchange of rocket fire would have led to casualties on both sides, the technological development of the Iron Dome, Israel’s new missile defense shield, allowed Israel to weather the rocket attacks with little to no damage. Gaza has no similar defense shield so the Israeli response of dropping rockets on Gaza while incurring no damage amongst their own population only incensed the people of Gaza further. Israel had the technology to protect themselves and their territory from Gaza’s rudimentary rocket assault with no casualties. By returning fire, they ensured that anger and rage at the indiscriminate deaths of Palestinians would continue unabated, allowing them to commit military ground forces to a campaign bent on destroying Gaza.

On the 16th of July, 2014, as Israeli forces massed on border of Gaza to prepare for a ground invasion after days of rocket attacks, the Israeli Navy targeted 4 children playing soccer on the beach in full public view. Two rockets were fired, one landing near the children and scattering them. They ran, the second landed and killed them all. The response in Gaza raised the level of anger to its highest pitch. Israel initially claimed the shelling of a public beach was purely accidental, then offered a small humanitarian window. They would use this time to finish massing their forces along the Gaza border.

The same day this widely condemned attack occurred, the Conservative Party of Canada released a militaristic propaganda video titled ‘Through Fire and Water’ that made use of key trigger words and phrases from his speech in January, combined with headlines of current events regarding the conflict that reinforced his incitement. It reiterated that Israel was a Jewish nation, and that Palestinians in Gaza were not citizens of a nation, therefore not deserving of equal rights. He advised them that Canada would stand with them as they used military force to settle their differences. This use of quotes and incitement crossed the line from a normal balanced Canadian foreign policy into outright criminal genocidal hate propaganda.

Here’s where these two seemingly isolated stories of nationalist aggression coincide:

  • On the 17th of July, as Israel is poised to invade Gaza, MH17 is shot down over Eastern Ukraine, killing 1 Canadian.
  • Western Media and governments immediately accuse rebels and Russia of downing MH17
  • Ukraine quickly releases an audio clip onto social media, claiming to be the voices of rebels taking credit for the downing
  • With the media attention now on the situation in Ukraine, Israel initiates their ground offensive within minutes of the downing of MH17.

 

The common factors in these situations?

  • Malaysians are primarily Muslims, just like the Palestinians
  • MH17 and MH370 were both involved with directing media attention regarding Ukraine
  • The Harper Government was involved in legitimizing the Maidan coup, getting the current President of Ukraine elected, and overseeing their current Parliamentary elections
  • The Harper Government was responsible for the breakdown of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, and stoked the fires of hatred using sophisticated language that went undetected to the average uninformed listener
  • The Harper Government immediately condemned Russia for the downing of MH17 and supported Israeli aggression
  • Media fervor regarding MH17 eclipsed the brutality of the Gaza-Israel conflict

 

After witnessing these events, I couldn’t sit by and do nothing. The entire situation reeks of collusion to mislead and defraud the Canadian public into supporting ultra-nationalist states and secularist religious interpretations. It flies in the face of everything I’ve been raised to think Canada stood for.

On the 21st of July, I filed charges against Stephen Harper and John Baird with the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary in Corner Brook for creation and dissemination of hate propaganda and incitement towards genocide under Canadian Criminal Code section 318 in relation to the video they’d released on the 16th of July titled “Through Fire and Water.”

Prior to filing the charges, I’d started a petition with the intention of collecting signatures of people who also considered the video to be hate propaganda and incitement towards genocide. The petition had over 2000 signatures from Canadians and citizens of other nations around the world before it was finally delivered to the only leader of a Federal party who didn’t make a genocidal or dehumanizing statement during the Israeli-Gaza war, MP Elizabeth May.

The charges were forwarded from the RNC to the RCMP and I received a response that I’ve been told came from the RCMP War Measures Department. The charges were dismissed without filing paperwork on August 1st. I filed a formal complaint with the Commission for Complaints Against the RCMP on August 5th pertaining to their failure to properly investigate and document the charges. The complaint was mailed out to myself and the RCMP on the 6th of August. The following week an indefinite gag order was issued by the Public Safety Minister for the RCMP Complaints Commission on the 12th, forbidding them from discussing sensitive case material that could impact national security with the general public.

After several months of waiting (and pestering), I met with the RCMP to discuss Formal Complaint on the 22nd of October. The complaint is under review and the initial stage should be complete by this coming week.

I’ve written this to ask for assistance in seeing a wrong identified and corrected. The Harper Government is dragging Canadians and the World through Hell and endangering our lives. They supported the overthrow and establishment of the new Ukrainian government who used the downing of MH17 as a pretext to increase hostilities against those in Eastern Ukraine, killing a Canadian citizen in the process. Their continued hostilities towards Russia, backed by NATO and the West, are pushing the world closer and closer to a new Cold War and new nuclear arms race. They are blatantly supporting violent regimes that are enacting genocidal policies against their neighbors.

Media events are being orchestrated in such a way to distract the public from their actions on the global stage. These are ‘Wag the Dog’ American political tactics at their worst. CBC is being used as a mouthpiece for a very dangerous foreign policy that will strip away the civil liberties of Canadians under the guise of ‘protection from terrorism’.

I realize that many of these issues are outside the awareness of most Canadians. Many receive their information only from CBC, which brings me to another piece of the puzzle. In the Fall of 2010, I started working for Alpha Technologies, a power supply company based out of BC. I was in charge of overseeing projects for their new Field Service division. The first project that I oversaw was the installation of new power systems to support a Rogers optic fiber line in CBC headquarters across the country. I wasn’t made aware of the purpose of the installations until the project was almost completed.

Under the guise of CBC budget cuts to reduce staffing requirements, these fiber lines were being installed to centralize the Master Control of each provincial CBC broadcasting headquarters with a central office in Ottawa. I didn’t think about it at the time, but this centralization took place immediately before the 2011 Elections. Its purpose seems to have been to limit the effectiveness of CBC’s investigative journalism, allowing the Harper government to steal the 2011 Election while minimizing the impact of the Robocall Scandal. I still have all the project documentation from these installations.

There’s also an issue regarding the Conservatives current use of subliminal imagery in their campaign ads to disturb the sensibilities of Canadians. At first, I found it hard to fathom that someone could be using such imagery blatantly, but it appears their intentions are to target mentally unstable Canadians. Their intent is to radicalize these individuals as a pretext for cracking down on dissent. This is a direct attack against the Rights and Freedoms of Canadian citizens.

In the case of the Ottawa shooter, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, media reports mentioned that he’d spoken to friends about being pursued by the Devil. This was at the same time he was being investigated by the RCMP and CSIS under the direction of the Harper government, who had already confiscated his passport. The same Harper government that released the following photo I’ve modified to illustrated the subliminal elements present.

B1_7c1RIQAACOEV (1)

 

I hope that I haven’t lost you by this point. As I’d mentioned in the beginning, the situation seems either shocking or ridiculous, but as MP Elizabeth May so succinctly put it earlier this year, the PMO appears to be full of “Cutthroat psychopaths.”

As a native son of Newfoundland and Labrador, I don’t think we should be supporting the kind of government who assaults Canadians by imposing their own brand of twisted morality. They’re exposing us to a barrage of imagery meant to degrade and disturb and writing Laws meant to divide us that victimize or marginalize entire classes of society.

Something needs to be done to stop these depredations. If the RCMP have their hands tied and can only do so much to investigate at this time, we don’t have to continue to submit. We should be raising our voices to show that we won’t buckle under pressure from a Federal Government gone mad. Legislature can use the Notwithstanding Clause to impugn the Acts of Parliament being forced on us by our own version of the Christian Taliban. Newfoundland and Labrador can be the first to recognize these psychopaths creating global instability to further their own ultra-nationalist agenda.

Should we choose ignorance and continue to allow our homeland to be used to legitimize these crimes against humanity, we become complicit in those same crimes.

-Andrew

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!

truthinpublishing-2

There are laws in Canada and the US that prevent inciting genocide.

I sometimes wonder how many people will be arrested for their Social Media comments when the world wakes up and the police start doing their job.

What are we paying you for? Certainly not just to eat donuts, stop speeders and bust potheads.

But instead of cops arresting people and government officials for genocidal comments, they’re getting bought off with new military hardware and engaging in racial and religious profiling. Targeting religious groups, stalking them, killing them… while ignoring the others who are daily murdering children in public to terrorize a population into submission. Sure, the job security is great, but you’re doing shitty job protecting the peace. You got bought off with toys, paid for with the public’s money. A bribe, given by the government for use against the people, to uphold a system of privileged law.

What is this privileged law bullshit anyways? What Cop in his right mind thinks anyone in Canada is Above the Law?

Canada’s Charter makes it very clear that the only thing above the Law in Canada is God. The police, with their duty to uphold the Charter and enforce the Criminal Code, only have God above them. Everyone is subject to the Rule of Law. The police don’t get to write the laws, just enforce them. They’re not doing their jobs.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Especially for a police officer.

Arrest Harper for Inciting Genocide against Muslims

ShareEVOLUTION IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE!